Home Business Page 15

Business

CME Group Software Engineer Guilty of Stealing Trade Secrets

CME Group Software Engineer Guilty of Stealing Trade Secrets

On September 19, 2012, the US Attorney’s Office in the Northern District of Illinois reported that Chunlai Yang pleaded guilty of two counts theft of trade secrets after working for CME Group for 11 years. 

Yang admitted to downloading over 10,000 files of CME source code which provide significant amounts of information about the Globex electronic trading platform.  The U.S. Attorney’s Office states that Yang made plans “to improve an electronic trading exchange in China as well.  All in all, the government estimates the potential loses between $50 million and $100 million, and Yang is arguing the potential losses were under $55.7 million. 

During his time at CME Group, Yang was responsible for writing code.  Because of his position, Yang had access to programs that maintained the Globex electronic trading platform.  The software programs were property of CME Group, but Yang had proceeded in downloading manuals and instructions on how the computer files operate. 

The U.S. Attorney’s Office concludes that Yang and two unnamed business affiliates were planning to open a business in China called the Tongmei Futures Exchange Software Technology Company (Gateway).  The purpose of the company was to increase trade volume to the Zhangjiagang Exchange, a Chinese chemical electronic trading exchange.  Yang was as far as contract negotiations with the Shangjigang Free Trade Board. 

Yang faces a maximum penalty of 10 years in prison and a $250,000 for each count.  The plea agreement will place Yang in prison for 70 to 87 months.  The sentencing is scheduled for February 20, 2013.

In addition, Yang agreed to forfeit his personal computers, electronic storage equipment, and more.  The personal computers and USB equipment contained the files he stole from CME Group. 

The United States is being represented Assistant United States Attorneys Barry Jonas and Paul Tzur. 

Source: Federal Bureau of Investigation

Department of Justice and Federal Trade Commission Sign Memorandum with Two Indian Authorities

Department of Justice and Federal Trade Commission Sign Memorandum with Two Indian Authorities

On September 27, 2012, the US Department of Justice and the Federal Trade Commission signed a memorandum of understanding with the Government of India Ministry of Corporate Affairs as well as the Competition Commission of India.  The antitrust memorandum encourages increased cooperation between competition agencies in each country. 

The first key part of the MOU addresses cooperation.  The provision states that U.S. antitrust agencies and Indian authorities will cooperate and inform each other about competition policies and changes to enforcement in specific jurisdictions.  If the United States and India are investigating a similar matter, the two countries have agreed to cooperate. 

The second key part of the MOU stresses communication.  The provision states that United States and India will keep each other updated about all competition enforcement and policies addressing enforcement.  The provisions also states that the United States and India will engage in meetings from time to time in order to discuss policy and enforcement information. 

Joseph Wayland, the Acting Assistant Attorney General, stated, “We value our relationship with the Indian Ministry of Corporate Affairs and the Competition Commission of India.  We know that this memorandum of understanding will enhance that relationship in the years ahead, as we work together to ensure that markets are open and competitive, by identifying and remedying anticompetitive behavior.” 

The memorandum was signed by Wayland, Chairman Jon Leibowitz under the FTC, Nirupama Rao, the Indian Ambassador to the United States for the Indian Ministry of Corporate Affairs, and CCI Chairman Ashok Chawla.

Chairman Leibowitz commented, “We are delighted to enter into this memorandum of understanding with the Indian Ministry of Corporate Affairs and the Competition Commission of India.  It will strengthen the already excellent relations among the U.S. and Indian competition authorities by further facilitating cooperation on policy and enforcement matters.”

Source: Department of Justice

The Home Business Ideas of Your Dreams!

The Home Business Ideas of Your Dreams!

A home
business is classified as a business maintained from an individual and/or
private residence. Home business ideas can vary from methodology of operations to
a part-time or full-time basis. There are a wide range of determinants involved
in the implementation of home business ideas, such as their legitimacy,
solvency, and legality.

What are some Home Business Ideas?

Online Home Business Ideas

Due the advents in technology enjoyed by citizens
of the world, a vast array of businesses can be conducted online (i.e., via the
internet). As a result, much of the commerce that takes place does so through
the internet marketplace, which is also known as E-Commerce. Home business
ideas can range from products and services that can be purchased and shipped
from the comfort of one’s home, such as the following:

Web design, consultation, and development;

Freelance editing, writing, and research;

Moderation, upkeep, and maintenance of websites;

The production and sale of goods or products.

In-house Home Business Ideas


Home business ideas can also include products or
services that can be conducted using an individual home or residence as a base
of operations. For example, it is not uncommon for individuals to utilize their
homes as ad-hoc offices and/or meeting places in which business is conducted. The
following are some examples of home business ideas that can be conducted from
one’s home:

Consultation services, event planning, and
project management
;

Lessons, classes, and educational workshops conducted from the
home
;

Home assembly and manufacturing;

Retail, resale, wholesale, and consignment operations.

Legality of a Home Business

The parameters and protocols surrounding both the
establishment and maintenance of a home business vary on an individual basis
and in conjunction with the established legality, taxation, and operations of
business law and legislation. All home business documentation should be
completed to the fullest extent in a meticulous fashion. In the event that an
individual experiences difficulty completing or understanding the requirements
of establishing a home business, they are encouraged to consult an attorney
specializing in employment, business, copyright, and labor law.
 

Legitimate Home Business Ideas 

An attorney should be consulted prior to the
establishment of any business endeavor in the event that an individual is not
well-versed in business law practice. Although there exists a multitude of home
business ideas, an individual interested in establishing a home business is
encouraged to explore their validity and legitimacy, as well as their
originality. Copyright violations are illegal, and one’s protection from
lawsuits and citations are in the best interest of any individual. The legal
review of the originality and legitimacy of a particular home business idea by
a legal professional can allow for added protection, legal insight, and strict
adherence with all applicable laws.
 

Avoiding Fraudulent Home Business Ideas

Due to the desire for home business ideas, there
exist many scams and fraudulent practices that consist of ‘get-rich-quick’
schemes. Despite any promises of guaranteed success, these practices should be
avoided at all costs. In the event of uncertainty in regards to the validity of
a home business idea or opportunity, an attorney or accredited business
resource should always be consulted prior to engaging in the home business
idea.
 

Case Bond

Case Bond

 


What is a Case Bond?

 

A case bond occurs when a company or firm buys full or partial rights to the settlement of the lawsuit before or while litigation is still occurring.  Litigation is extremely expensive, and high-profile cases can have attorneys’ fees and court costs amount to hundreds of thousands of dollars.  The bond is offered to the litigant while the case is moving through court so they can pay for personal expenses. 

 

What Happens if the Litigant Loses the Case?

 

Such a bond is sometimes a risky investment because the litigant is not required to pay anything to the company or firm that issued the bond if they lose the case.  If the litigant wins the case, the bond automatically matures and the litigation pays for the bond with the funds obtained from the settlement. 

 

Advantages and Disadvantages of a Case Bond

 

The advantages of such a bond allow a litigant to pay for expenses while the case is moving through court.  The litigant may have a large amount of bills depending on the case, such as medical bills, living expenses, and even attorneys’ fees that need paid immediately.  The bond allows the litigant to pay for these expenses and remain receive less intimidation of the court costs.

 

A common strategy used by large companies is to keep appealing the case to run up court costs and attorneys’ fees.  The litigant thus becomes intimidated and may drop the case if the results are questionable.  The bond allows the litigant to avoid other options of paying for the case like taking out a home equity line of credit or taking out a private loan. 

 

The obvious disadvantage to agreeing to a case bond is being left with little or no settlement money after the case comes to an end.  Such bonds come along with a fee as well.  This fee can be large in some cases and offsets some of the risk taken on by the firm after issuing the bond.  If the plaintiff wins the case, they will have to pay the fee along with the bond, which can further deplete their settlement money. 

 

Talk with an Attorney before Agreeing to a Case Bond

 

It’s imperative that you speak with your attorney before agreeing to such a bond.  Your attorney will be able to tell you about the risks involved and your chances of winning the case.  The attorney can also help you fill out paperwork associated with the bond.  The litigant is required to sign documents that give the bond company rights to the compensation at the end of the case. 

 

Attorneys can issue a bond is some cases as well.  The firm may issue the bond and provide conditions in the settlement agreement for the plaintiff to reimburse expenses at the end of the case—especially if the attorney is working on contingency. 

Economic Opportunity Act Text

Economic Opportunity Act Text

FINDINGS AND DECLARATION OF PURPOSE SEC. 2. Although the economic well-being and prosperity of the United States have progressed to a level surpassing any achieved in world history, and although these benefits are widely shared throughout the Nation, poverty continues to be the lot of a substantial number of our people. The United States can achieve its full economic and social potential as a nation only if every individual has the opportunity to contribute to the full extent of his capabilities and to participate in the workings of our society. It is, therefore, the policy of the United States to eliminate the paradox of poverty in the midst of plenty in this Nation by opening to everyone the opportunity for education and training, the opportunity to work, and the opportunity to live in decency and dignity. It is the purpose of this Act to strengthen, supplement, and coordinate efforts in furtherance of that policy.

 


TITLE I–YOUTH PROGRAMS

 


PART A–JOB CORPS

 


STATEMENT OF PURPOSE

 


SEC. 101. The purpose of this part is to prepare for the responsibilities of citizenship and to increase the employability of young men and young women aged sixteen through twenty-one by providing them in rural and urban residential centers with education, vocational training, useful work experience, including work directed toward the conservation of natural resources, and other appropriate activities.

 


ESTABLISHMENT OF JOB CORPS

 


SEC. 102. In order to carry out the purposes of this part, there is hereby established within the Office of Economic Opportunity (hereinafter referred to as the "Office"), established by title VI, a Job Corps (herinafter referred to as the "Corps").

 


JOB CORPS PROGRAM

 


SEC. 103. The Director of the Office (herinafter referred to as the "Director") is authorized to–

 


(a) enter into agreements with any Federal, State, or local agency or private organization for the establishment and operation, in rural and urban areas, of conservation camps and training centers and for the provision of such facilities and services as in his judgment are needed to carry out the purposes of this part,. . . .

 


PART B–WORK-TRAINING PROGRAMS

 


STATEMENT OF PURPOSE

 


SEC. 111. The purpose of this part is to provide useful work experience opportunities for unemployed young men and young women, through participation in State and community work-training programs, so that their employability may be increased or their education resumed or continued and so that public agencies and private nonprofit organizations (other than political parties) will be enabled to carry out programs which will permit or contribute to an undertaking or service in the public interest that would not otherwise be provided, or will contribute to the conservation and development of natural resources and recreational areas. . . .

 


PART C–WORK-STUDY PROGRAMS

 


STATEMENT OF PURPOSE

 


The purpose of this part is to stimulate and promote the part-time employment of students in institutions of higher education who are from low-income families and are in need of the earnings from such employment to pursue courses of study at such institutions. . . .

 


TITLE II–URBAN AND RURAL COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAMS

 


PART A–GENERAL COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAMS

 


STATEMENT OF PURPOSE

 


SEC. 201. The purpose of this part is to provide stimulation and incentive for urban and rural communities to mobilize their resources to combat poverty through community action programs.

 


COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAMS

 


SEC. 202. (a) The term "community action program" means a program– . . . .

 


(2) which provides services, assistance, and other activities of sufficient scope and size to give promise of progress toward elimination of poverty or a cause or causes of poverty through developing employment opportunities, improving human performance, motivation, and productivity, or bettering the conditions under which people live, learn, and work;

 


(3) which is developed, conducted, and administered with the maximum feasible participation of residents of the areas and members of the groups served; and

 


(4) which is conducted, administered, or coordinated by a public or private nonprofit agency (other than a political party), or a combination thereof.

Minerals Separation Limited

Minerals Separation Limited

 


History of Minerals Separation Limited

The company was a small company based out of London that revolutionized a technique for ore extraction.  Before the technique was invented, other companies had problems separating silver, lead, and zinc from ore that was mined deep under the ground.  Most of the ore near the surface was oxidized which made it easier to smelt, but no technique was economical for ore at greater depths.

In 1905, Minerals Separation Limited improved a process that allowed for certain minerals to float on top of a mixture of water and chemicals and be skimmed off.  The original process proved successful but it was not possible on an industrial scale.  The process was revolutionized in 1905 when Minerals Separation added a small amount of oil to the pulp and added violent aeration to the mixture with machines. 

In July of 1906, a Belgium chemist by the name of Auguste De Bavay patented a process that improved the flotation process developed by Minerals Separation Limited and allowed zinc and silver-lead conglomerates to be separated from the pulp.  Between 1910 and 1912, Minerals Separation obtained a license from De Bavay and traded patents.

Minerals Separation v. Butte & Superior Mining Company

This case was argued on March 19, 1919 in a Circuit Court of Appeals after Minerals Separation Limited claimed Butte & Superior Mining Company committed patent infringement.  There were 13 claims relating to the patent infringement, but the case mainly addressed Butte & Superior’s use of oils in quantities less than one-half of 1 percent during the ore extraction. 

Minerals Separation claimed that the amount of oil was “critical” because it was the exact amount needed to extract the minerals from the ore.  The specification of the amount was included in the patent. 

The court stated the following about the specified amount of oil: “Such variation of treatment must be within the scope of the claims, and the certainty which the law requires in patents is not great than is reasonable, having regard to their subject-matter.  The process is one for dealing with a large class of substances and the range of treatment within the terms of the claims, while leaving something to the skill of persons applying the invention, is clearly sufficiently definite to guide those skilled in the art to its successful application, as the evidence abundantly shows.  This satisfies the law.”

Butte and Superior claimed that from January 9, 1917 to the time of the trial that they used more than 1 percent on the ore.  The mixture was made up of 18 percent pine oil, 12 percent of kerosene oil, and 70 percent fuel oil.  They claimed they used 30 pounds of the mixture on a ton of ore, which would equal 1.5 percent. 

However, Minerals Separation Limited claimed the kerosene and fuel oil were valueless in the process of extraction and claimed the pine oil equaled a percentage that infringed on the patent.  The case was remanded to the District Court for further opinions and proceedings. 

Federal Arbitration Act Text

Federal Arbitration Act Text

 
 
The below list documents a general outline for each section of the Federal Arbitration Act: 
 
 
Section 1: Federal Arbitration Act Text regarding Maritime Transactions and Commerce:
 
o The first section of the Federal Arbitration Act defines Maritime Transactions and Commerce and the regulations that go into arbitration for such business relations. The Federal Arbitration Act Text regards maritime transaction that may yield arbitration as any means of charter parties, agreements relating to wharfage, supplies furnished to repair vessels, collisions or bills of lading water
 
 
Section 2: Federal Arbitration Act Text regarding the validity and enforcement of agreements to arbitrate:
 
o This portion of the Federal Arbitration Act provides a written provision for any maritime transaction or contract involving commerce to settle through arbitration or any conflict that results thereafter. Arbitration is permitted for any breach of contract, including the refusal to perform all or any part of the agreement
 
 
Section 3: Federal Arbitration Act Text regarding Stay of Proceedings:
 
o States that any suit or proceeding must be brought in a United States court upon any issue referable to a panel or arbitrator under an agreement in writing for such arbitration efforts. 
 
 
Section 4: Federal Arbitration Act Text states that failure to arbitrate under agreement requires the filing of petition to the specific court the holds jurisdiction for order to compel the arbitration. 
 
 
Section 5: Federal Arbitration Act Text regarding the appointment of arbitrators:
 
o States that if the agreement names or appoints an arbitrator the course of action to choose the individual must be followed. If no method is provided in the agreement, the court will designate and subsequently appoint an arbitrator to hear the case. 
 
 
Section 6: Federal Arbitration Act Text Regarding Application heard as a motion
 
o Any application to the court is made and heard in the manner provided by law for hearing motions
 
 
Section 7: Federal Arbitration Act Text Regarding rules for witnesses, fees and compelling attendance:
 
o The arbitrator may summon (in writing) any individual to attend as a witness if the individual can provide a testimony, book, document or record that is regarded as material evidence in the case. The fees associated for attendance are the same as all United States courts. 
 
 
Section 8: Federal Arbitration Act Text regarding libel and seizure:
 
o The aggrieved party may begin their proceeding by libel and seizure of a vessel or property of the other party according to the course of admiralty proceedings. The court then has jurisdiction to direct the parties to proceed in arbitration and shall retain jurisdiction to enter its decree.
 
 
Section 9: Federal Arbitration Act Text regarding awards, confirmation and jurisdiction:
 
o If both parties both agree that a judgment shall be entered upon the award then at any time within one year after the award either party may apply to the court for an order confirming the award. If a court is not specified in the agreement, then the request will be filed with the United States court located in the district where the award was granted.
 
 
Section 10: Federal Arbitration Text regarding Vacation, rehearing
 
 
Section 11: Federal Arbitration Text regarding modification for grounds and order
 
 
Section 12: Federal Arbitration Text regarding the notice of motions to modify or vacate:
 
o The notice of a motion to modify, correct or vacate an award must be served to the losing party (or his attorney) within three months from the judgment or delivery of the award. 
 
 
The last section of the Federal Arbitration Act describes the appeal process.
 
 
Federal Arbitration Act Text:
 
 
9 U.S.C. § 1. "Maritime transactions" and "commerce" defined; exceptions to operation of title
 
 
"Maritime transactions," as herein defined, means charter parties, bills of lading of water carriers, agreements relating to wharfage, supplies furnished vessels or repairs to vessels, collisions, or any other matters in foreign commerce wh"''commerce", as herein defined, means commerce among the several States or with foreign nations, or in any Territory of the United States or in the District of Columbia, or between any such Territory and another, or between any such Territory and any State or foreign nation, or between the District of Columbia and any State or Territory or foreign nation, but nothing herein contained shall apply to contracts of employment of seamen, railroad employees, or any other class of workers engaged in foreign or interstate commerce.
 
 
9 U.S.C. § 2. Validity, irrevocability, and enforcement of agreements to arbitrate
 
 
A written provision in any maritime transaction or a contract evidencing a transaction involving commerce to settle by arbitration a controversy thereafter arising out of such contract or transaction, or the refusal to perform the whole or any part thereof, or an agreement in writing to submit to arbitration an existing controversy arising out of such a contract, transaction, or refusal, shall be valid, irrevocable, and enforceable, save upon such grounds as exist at law or in equity for the revocation of any contract.
 
 
9 U.S.C. § 3. Stay of proceedings where issue therein referable to arbitration
 
 
If any suit or proceeding be brought in any of the courts of the United States upon any issue referable to arbitration under an agreement in writing for such arbitration, the court in which such suit is pending, upon being satisfied that the issue involved in such suit or proceeding is referable to arbitration under such an agreement, shall on application of one of the parties stay the trial of the action until such arbitration has been had in accordance with the terms of the agreement, providing the applicant for the stay is not in default in proceeding with such arbitration.
 
 
9 U.S.C. § 4. Failure to arbitrate under agreement; petition to United States court having jurisdiction for order to compel arbitration; notice and service thereof; hearing and determination
 
 
A party aggrieved by the alleged failure, neglect, or refusal of another to arbitrate under a written agreement for arbitration may petition any United States district court which, save for such agreement, would have jurisdiction under title 28, in a civil action or in admiralty of the subject matter of a suit arising out of the controversy between the parties, for an order directing that such arbitration proceed in the manner provided for in such agreement. Five days' notice in writing of such application shall be served upon the party in default. Service thereof shall be made in the manner provided by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The court shall hear the parties, and upon being satisfied that the making of the agreement for arbitration or the failure to comply therewith is not in issue, the court shall make an order directing the parties to proceed to arbitration in accordance with the terms of the agreement. The hearing and proceedings, under such agreement, shall be within the district in which the petition for an order directing such arbitration is filed. If the making of the arbitration agreement or the failure, neglect, or refusal to perform the same be in issue, the court shall proceed summarily to the trial thereof. If no jury trial be demanded by the party alleged to be in default, or if the matter in dispute is within admiralty jurisdiction, the court shall hear and determine such issue. Where such an issue is raised, the party alleged to be in default may, except in cases of admiralty, on or before the return day of the notice of application, demand a jury trial of such issue, and upon such demand the court shall make an order referring the issue or issues to a jury in the manner provided by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, or may specially call a jury for that purpose. If the jury find that no agreement in writing for arbitration was made or that there is no default in proceeding thereunder, the proceeding shall be dismissed. If the jury find that an agreement for arbitration was made in writing and that there is a default in proceeding thereunder, the court shall make an order summarily directing the parties to proceed with the arbitration in accordance with the terms thereof.
 
 
9 U.S.C. § 5. Appointment of arbitrators or umpire
 
 
If in the agreement provision be made for a method of naming or appointing an arbitrator or arbitrators or an umpire, such method shall be followed; but if no method be provided therein, or if a method be provided and any party thereto shall fail to avail himself of such method, or if for any other reason there shall be a lapse in the naming of an arbitrator or arbitrators or umpire, or in filling a vacancy, then upon the application of either party to the controversy the court shall designate and appoint an arbitrator or arbitrators or umpire, as the case may require, who shall act under the said agreement with the same force and effect as if he or they had been specifically named therein; and unless otherwise provided in the agreement the arbitration shall be by a single arbitrator.
 
 
9 U.S.C. § 6. Application heard as motion
 
 
Any application to the court hereunder shall be made and heard in the manner provided by law for the making and hearing of motions, except as otherwise herein expressly provided.
 
 
9 U.S.C. § 7. Witnesses before arbitrators; fees; compelling attendance
 
 
The arbitrators selected either as prescribed in this title or otherwise, or a majority of them, may summon in writing any person to attend before them or any of them as a witness and in a proper case to bring with him or them any book, record, document, or paper which may be deemed material as evidence in the case. The fees for such attendance shall be the same as the fees of witnesses before masters of the United States courts. Said summons shall issue in the name of the arbitrator or arbitrators, or a majority of them, and shall be signed by the arbitrators, or a majority of them, and shall be directed to the said person and shall be served in the same manner as subpoenas to appear and testify before the court; if any person or persons so summoned to testify shall refuse or neglect to obey said summons, upon petition the United States district court for the district in which such arbitrators, or a majority of them, are sitting may compel the attendance of such person or persons before said arbitrator or arbitrators, or punish said person or persons for contempt in the same manner provided by law for securing the attendance of witnesses or their punishment for neglect or refusal to attend in the courts of the United States.
 
 
9 U.S.C. § 8. Proceedings begun by libel in admiralty and seizure of vessel or property
 
 
If the basis of jurisdiction be a cause of action otherwise justiciable in admiralty, then, notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, the party claiming to be aggrieved may begin his proceeding hereunder by libel and seizure of the vessel or other property of the other party according to the usual course of admiralty proceedings, and the court shall then have jurisdiction to direct the parties to proceed with the arbitration and shall retain jurisdiction to enter its decree upon the award.
 
 
9 U.S.C. § 9. Award of arbitrators; confirmation; jurisdiction; procedure
 
 
If the parties in their agreement have agreed that a judgment of the court shall be entered upon the award made pursuant to the arbitration, and shall specify the court, then at any time within one year after the award is made any party to the arbitration may apply to the court so specified for an order confirming the award, and thereupon the court must grant such an order unless the award is vacated, modified, or corrected as prescribed in sections 10 and 11 of this title. If no court is specified in the agreement of the parties, then such application may be made to the United States court in and for the district within which such award was made. Notice of the application shall be served upon the adverse party, and thereupon the court shall have jurisdiction of such party as though he had appeared generally in the proceeding. If the adverse party is a resident of the district within which the award was made, such service shall be made upon the adverse party or his attorney as prescribed by law for service of notice of motion in an action in the same court. If the adverse party shall be a nonresident, then the notice of the application shall be served by the marshal of any district within which the adverse party may be found in like manner as other process of the court.
 
 
9 U.S.C. § 10. Same; vacation; grounds; rehearing
 
 
(a) In any of the following cases the United States court in and for the district wherein the award was made may make an order vacating the award upon the application of any party to the arbitration –
 
o (1) Where the award was procured by corruption, fraud, or undue means.
 
o (2) Where there was evident partiality or corruption in the arbitrators, or either of them.
 
o (3) Where the arbitrators were guilty of misconduct in refusing to postpone the hearing, upon sufficient cause shown, or in refusing to hear evidence pertinent and material to the controversy; or of any other misbehavior by which the rights of any party have been prejudiced.
 
o (4) Where the arbitrators exceeded their powers, or so imperfectly executed them that a mutual, final, and definite award upon the subject matter submitted was not made.
 
o (5) Where an award is vacated and the time within which the agreement required the award to be made has not expired the court may, in its discretion, direct a rehearing by the arbitrators.
 
 
(b) The United States district court for the district wherein an award was made that was issued pursuant to section 580 of title 5 may make an order vacating the award upon the application of a person, other than a party to the arbitration, who is adversely affected or aggrieved by the award, if the use of arbitration or the award is clearly inconsistent with the factors set forth in section 572 of title 5
 
 
9 U.S.C. § 11. Same; modification or correction; grounds; order
In either of the following cases the United States court in and for the district wherein the award was made may make an order modifying or correcting the award upon the application of any party to the arbitration –
 
 
(a) Where there was an evident material miscalculation of figures or an evident material mistake in the description of any person, thing, or property referred to in the award.
 
 
(b) Where the arbitrators have awarded upon a matter not submitted to them, unless it is a matter not affecting the merits of the decision upon the matter submitted.
 
 
(c) Where the award is imperfect in matter of form not affecting the merits of the controversy. The order may modify and correct the award, so as to effect the intent thereof and promote justice between the parties.
 
 
9 U.S.C. § 12. Notice of motions to vacate or modify; service; stay of proceedings
Notice of a motion to vacate, modify, or correct an award must be served upon the adverse party or his attorney within three months after the award is filed or delivered. If the adverse party is a resident of the district within which the award was made, such service shall be made upon the adverse party or his attorney as prescribed by law for service of notice of motion in an action in the same court. If the adverse party shall be a nonresident then the notice of the application shall be served by the marshal of any district within which the adverse party may be found in like manner as other process of the court. For the purposes of the motion any judge who might make an order to stay the proceedings in an action brought in the same court may make an order, to be served with the notice of motion, staying the proceedings of the adverse party to enforce the award.
 
 
9 U.S.C. § 13. Papers filed with order on motions; judgment; docketing; force and effect; enforcement
The party moving for an order confirming, modifying, or correcting an award shall, at the time such order is filed with the clerk for the entry of judgment thereon, also file the following papers with the clerk:
 
 
(a) The agreement; the selection or appointment, if any, of an additional arbitrator or umpire; and each written extension of the time, if any, within which to make the award.
 
 
(b) The award.
 
 
(c) Each notice, affidavit, or other paper used upon an application to confirm, modify, or correct the award, and a copy of each order of the court upon such an application. 
 
 
The judgment shall be docketed as if it was rendered in an action. 
 
 
The judgment so entered shall have the same force and effect, in all respects, as, and be subject to all the provisions of law relating to, a judgment in an action; and it may be enforced as if it had been rendered in an action in the court in which it is entered.
 
 
9 U.S.C. § 14. Contracts not affected
 
This title shall not apply to contracts made prior to January 1, 1926.
 
 
9 U.S.C. § 15. Inapplicability of the Act of State doctrine
 
Enforcement of arbitral agreements, confirmation of arbitral awards, and execution upon judgments based on orders confirming such awards shall not be refused on the basis of the Act of State doctrine
 
 
9 U.S.C. § 16. Appeals
 
 
(a) An appeal may be taken from –
 
o (1) an order –
 
(A) refusing a stay of any action under section 3 of this title,
 
(B) denying a petition under section 4 of this title to order arbitration to proceed,
 
(C) denying an application under section 206 of this title to compel arbitration,
 
(D) confirming or denying confirmation of an award or partial award, or
 
(E) modifying, correcting, or vacating an award;
 
o (2) an interlocutory order granting, continuing, or modifying an injunction against an arbitration that is subject to this title; or
 
o (3) a final decision with respect to an arbitration that is 
 
 
subject to this title.
 
 
(b) Except as otherwise provided in section 1292(b) of title 28, an appeal may not be taken from an interlocutory order –
 
o (1) granting a stay of any action under section 3 of this title;
 
o (2) directing arbitration to proceed under section 4 of this title;
 
o (3) compelling arbitration under section 206f this title; or
 
o (4) refusing to enjoin an arbitration that is subject to this title
 
 
 

Economic Opportunity Act

Economic Opportunity Act

 
 
 
 
What is Economic Opportunity Act of 1964?
 
 
Enacted by President Lyndon B. Johnson in August of 1964, the Economic Opportunity Act was a fundamental law of Johnson’s War on Poverty. Implemented by the Office of Economic Opportunity, the legislation included a variety of social programs to promote education, general welfare and health for the impoverished in America. Although the majority of the provisions of the Economic Opportunity Act of 1964 have since been rolled back, weakened or modified, its core programs (Job Corps and Head Start) remain intact. 
 
 
The philosophy behind the Economic Opportunity Act did not focus on wealth distribution, but instead, the belief that government must provide impoverished people with opportunities to earn a respectable wage and maintain their families in a comfortable setting. President Johnson identified the constitutional basis for the Economic Opportunity Act of 1964 by stating Congress’ responsibility to provide for the general welfare of American citizens. 
 
 
Why was the Economic Opportunity Act Created?
 
 
The 1960s represented a period of great reform. During this time, poverty was rising due to the widening of the wealth gap and an assortment of other economic factors. The President’s Council of Economic Adviser’, in 1964, issued a report that focused solely on the problem of poverty in the United States. This report included statistics that revealed–in the greatest time of prosperity in the nation—that nearly 20% of American families were poor (incomes under $3,000 for a family of four). The report also revealed that over 50% of non-whites were living in poverty. 
 
 
In January of 1964, President Johnson and his cabinet developed a bill to curb increasing poverty in the United States. The provisions and the newly-found programs (explained below) of the Economic Opportunity Act were funded by Congress on the final day of the 1964 Congressional session–$800 million was delivered to the programs for the fiscal year of 1965. 
 
 
Foundation of the Economic Opportunity Act:
 
 
The Economic Opportunity Act employed two mechanisms to provide welfare to the impoverished. First, the Economic opportunity Act of 1964, established eleven federal programs that were run by the Office of Economic Opportunity—the programs are listed below:
 
 
Job Corps: The creation of the Economic Opportunity Act of 1964 gave way to the establishment of Job Corps, which provides basic education, work and training resources in residential centers for young students, between the ages of sixteen and twenty-one
 
 
Neighborhood Youth Corps: The creation of the Economic Opportunity Act of 1964 established the Neighborhood Youth Corps, which provides training and employment opportunities for young men and women, between 16 and 21 years of age, who come from impoverished families and communities. 
 
 
Work Study Programs: Central programs created by the Economic Opportunity Act, these programs provide grants to institutions of higher education (colleges and universities) for part-time employment of young students from low-income families. Candidates for these work study programs need the employment to earn money for their pursuit of education.
 
 
Adult Basic Education: Provides grants to educational agencies (on the local level) for programs of instruction for individuals over the age of 18. Individuals who utilize this program of the Economic Opportunity Act struggle with the English language (candidates possess marginal reading and writing capabilities which serve as an impediment to employment).
 
 
Urban and Rural Community Action: Provides technical and financial assistance to public and private nonprofit groups for the development of community action programs that yield a maximum feasible participation of the impoverished. These groups are created to give promise of progress towards the mass elimination of poverty in the United States.
 
 
Voluntary Assistance for Needy Children: The creation of the Economic Opportunity Act of 1964 gave way to the establishment of the Voluntary Assistance for Needy Children campaign, which established a coordination and information center to encourage voluntary assistance for needy youths. 
 
 
Financial Assistance to Rural Families: Another fundamental aspect of the Economic Opportunity Act of 1964; the Loans to Rural Families program provides financing of micro-loans (under $2,500) to low income rural families for the sole purpose of increasing their disposable income
 
 
Work Experience: The creation of the Economic Opportunity Act of 1964 established the Work Experience program, which provides financing for pilot, demonstration and experimental projects for the purpose of expanding opportunities for work experience and necessary training of individuals who are unable to support their families. 
 
 
Assistance for Migrant Agricultural Employees: provides assistance to state and local governments, as well as nonprofit agencies or individuals aligned with operating programs that assist migratory workers and their families with securing housing, education and resources to support their children. This program also provides sanitation help for those in need.
 
 
Employment and Investment Incentives: Another critical aspect of the Economic Opportunity Act of 1964, this program provides loans (under $25,000) to single borrowers to create small businesses and innovate the market
 
 
Volunteers in Service to America (VISTA Program): This program of the Economic Opportunity Act of 1964 recruits, selects, refers and trains volunteers to all local and state agencies, as well as nonprofit organizations, throughout the United States. The volunteers supplied by the VISTA program are required to perform duties to combat poverty in the United States.
 
 
In addition to creating and implementing the above programs, the Economic Opportunity Act of 1964 empowered the Director of the Office of Economic Opportunity to coordinate anti-poverty efforts of all government agencies. This provision of the Act was deemed necessary by Johnson, who was tired of the government’s inability to mitigate the social costs that arise due to poverty. 
 
 
This provision (the second mechanism of the Act) of the Economic Opportunity Act of 1964 directed government agencies to establish an Economic Opportunity Council–which was chaired by the director of the OEO and composed of various members of Johnson’s cabinet—to consult with various officials in effectively carrying out the above programs and functions. 
 
 
 The Economic Opportunity Act’s Impact:
 
 
From the onset of its passing, Republicans (and many Southern Democrats) attempted to dismantle the Economic Opportunity Act of 1964 and transfer the operating programs to various government departments and agencies. Congress eventually repealed the Act in 1981; however, a number of the programs established by the act have survived to present day. The majority of historians and political enthusiasts who debate the reasons for the OEO’s failure point to circuitous government actions—the flow of funds needed to support the programs were not properly handled. Additionally, the core vision of the Economic Opportunity Act was to rid all Americans of poverty. This goal, which is incredible ambitious in general, was not met with calculated means. There was no provision for the employment of adult men, there was no coordination between programs and lastly, commitment to the objective often took a backseat to international conflicts or other macro-economic incidences. 
 
 
 

Economy

Economy

What Exactly is the Economy?
The economy consists of the system of an area or country regarding its capital, labor, land resources, manufacturing, distribution, trade, and the consumption of services and goods in that specific area. The economy can also be thought of as the network of services and goods are exchanged in accordance to supply and demand between participants by either barter or a form of exchange with a given credit or debit amount defined within the network. All occupations, economic agents, professions, and economic activities, contribute in some way to the economy. Saving, investing, and consumption are the main variable components of the economy and are used to determine market equilibrium.
A specific economy is the result of its development that includes social and historical organization, its geography, ecology, and natural resource endowment, as well as its technological evolution. These points create the content, context, and set up the parameters and conditions in which an economy functions.
Because of the growing importance and influence of the financial sector in more modern times, the economy is often looked at by politicians and analysts to as the portion of the economy that deals with the production of goods and services as well as the portion of the economy that looks at selling and buying on the financial markets. Both of these can be measured in many different ways. Some of the helpful indicative values used when looking at the economy include:
Balance of Trade
Consumer spending
Exchange Rate
GDP
GDP per capita
GNP
Gross domestic product
Interest Rate
National Debt
Rate of Inflation
Stock Market
Unemployment

Home Based Business Opportunities

Home Based Business Opportunities

What are Home Based Business Opportunities?
 
A home based business opportunity is any type of business that does not require a physical place of business, other than your residence.  Home based business opportunities have become much more popular in recent years, due to global connectivity by email, the internet, and smart phone devices.  
How to run a Home Based Business Opportunity
1. The first step in running your home business opportunity is to ensure that your business can be adequately run out of your home.  If your business requires in person communication, meeting with clients, or visibility to the public, you may have issues with your business not having a physical location.  Instead, businesses that can be done completely over the phone or electronic communication are adept for a home based business opportunity.   
2. Once you have determined your business can be run from home, you must ensure that you can work at home.  Working at home can be difficult for many people, due to the possible distractions, lack of leaving your home during the day, and the isolation that may occur.  It is important that you realize that working from home is very different than working in an outside place of business.  You will also need to ensure that your home is equipped to handle your business.  You will need some space (such as a room set aside as an office), low noise levels, and a steady communication network.  
3. After you have determined that a home based business opportunity is right for you, you will need to determine what type of business you want to run and at what level you want to run it.  The most common home based businesses are purchasing and seeking items over internet markets, such as EBAY or craigslist.  Products that you produce or items secured for resale have boomed in recent years due to the popularity of these types of websites that bring purchasers and sellers together over electronic space.  Other businesses may also be available, such as the writing and editing of documents, consulting, or even communication jobs.  
4. Finally, once you have chosen a home based business opportunity and determined that you and your home are equipped to handle it, you should begin to implement the business into your home.  Prepare your workspace, set aside a place for any needed instruments of the trade, and start to build your client base.  When you start putting your business plan into place, you will probably need to make many changes and adapt to unforeseen circumstances.   
Maintaining and Updating your Home Business Opportunity.  
You home based business opportunity will need constant maintenance and updates in order to survive.  Just like any business with a physical building, you will need to keep track of any billing, accounting, and legal work that is necessary to keep your business running.  You will need to document your accounts receivable and business expenses and have them prepared for taxation.  If your business starts to grow, you may need to consider bringing in additional employees, which may or may not be able to work from their home or from yours.
Updating your home business is always something you need to consider.  All businesses must adapt or they face failure from new and more efficient businesses.  Consider watching what other home businesses do and try to learn from their mistakes or their successes.  

Attorneys, Get Listed

X